Home / Styles / The History of the Mullet
Styles · Antiquity to today

The History of the Mullet: From Hector of Troy to the Beastie Boys

Business in the front, party in the back is a 1990s joke. The haircut itself is roughly three thousand years older.

By the History of Hair Editorial TeamPublished 3 November 20268 min read4 sources

Few haircuts have a reputation as loud as the mullet. It has been mocked, banned from school photos, celebrated at county fairs and revived on fashion runways, sometimes all in the same decade. Yet the word we use for it is surprisingly young, and the shape it describes is surprisingly old. To understand the mullet properly you have to separate the two: the name, which arrived in the 1990s, and the cut, which appears in sources from the ancient Mediterranean onward.

In this story we follow both. We start with the word, because the word is where most myths about the mullet begin, and then travel backward to Troy, Rome and Constantinople before returning to the stadiums, recording studios and barbershops of the twentieth century.

A name coined in 1994

The Oxford English Dictionary, the most careful record of English usage, states that mullet as the name of this hairstyle was apparently coined, and certainly popularised, by the American hip-hop group the Beastie Boys. Their 1994 song Mullet Head used mullet and mullet head as insults and described the cut in barbershop language: short on the sides, untouched at the back, longer on top. The following year the band ran a six-page feature in issue 2 of their magazine Grand Royal, titled Mulling Over the Mullet, which listed alternative names for the style such as the Hockey Player Haircut and the Soccer Rocker [1].

That matters for anyone writing about the cut. Before the mid-1990s, people who wore it did not call it a mullet. A 1970s rock fan might have described a shag, a layered cut or simply long hair. A frequently shared scan of an Australian car magazine appeared to show the word in use in January 1992, but the dictionary's editors could not verify it, and it was later found to be a digitally altered fake [1]. The lesson is simple and useful for any history of hair: names are often applied after the fact, and a retrospective label can make a style seem more unified than it ever was.

There is an older phrase that sometimes gets pulled into the story. Mullet head had existed as a mild insult in American English long before the 1990s, meaning roughly a dull or stupid person. The insult and the haircut only met when the Beastie Boys joined them, which is why serious dictionaries date the hairstyle sense to the 1990s rather than to the nineteenth century.

Hector-like hair in the ancient world

If the name is modern, the shape is not. Ancient Greek writers described a haircut that was short at the front and long at the back, and they attached it to some of the most famous fighters in their stories. The poet Lycophron referred to a Hector-like hairstyle, linking the look to the Trojan hero Hector, and the cut was also associated with Italian peoples such as the Daunians and Peucetians [1].

There is a practical logic often suggested for this shape. Hair kept short at the front stays out of the eyes, while hair left long at the back protects the neck from sun and cold. That explanation is plausible, and it is repeated often, but we should be honest that it is an inference. The ancient sources tell us what people wore and who wore it. They rarely tell us why, and we should be careful not to put modern practical reasoning into ancient mouths.

Roman emperors with long backs

The Roman historian Suetonius, writing in the early second century CE, left one of the clearest descriptions. In his life of the emperor Tiberius he notes that Tiberius wore his hair rather long at the back, so much so that it covered the nape of his neck, and that this was a family tradition of the Claudians [1][2]. Portrait sculpture supports the general idea. One bust of Tiberius's great-nephew Caligula shows short locks across the forehead and longer hair behind [1].

Roman hair was political. Portraits of emperors were copied and sent across the empire, so a hairstyle on a marble head was also a message about lineage and identity. When Suetonius frames long hair at the nape as a Claudian family habit, he is describing more than grooming. He is pointing to a visible sign of belonging to one of Rome's great aristocratic families.

Roman Britain and a figurine from a car park

Archaeology occasionally adds a surprising piece to the picture. In 2018, during work on a new car park at the Wimpole Estate in England, archaeologists found a small metal figurine dated to the first century CE. Researchers suggested that its hairstyle could indicate that some native Britons under Roman rule wore their hair in a similar short-front, long-back arrangement [1]. A single figurine is thin evidence, and the people who studied it framed the idea as a hypothesis rather than a conclusion. Still, it is a reminder that hairstyles moved across the Roman world in many directions, not only from the capital outward.

The Hunnic look in Constantinople

Some of the most vivid evidence comes from sixth-century Constantinople. The Byzantine historian Procopius described young men of the Blue faction, one of the city's powerful chariot-racing and political factions, who wore their hair long at the back and cut it short over the forehead. Procopius called this a non-Roman fashion and linked it to the Huns [1]. In his own words, the factions cut the hair "off in front back to the temples, leaving the part behind to hang down to a very great length", and "for this reason they used to call this the 'Hunnic' fashion" [4].

Here the haircut is clearly a statement. Procopius was hostile to the factions, and his description is meant to show them as foreign and disorderly. That framing should make us cautious about taking his tone at face value, but it also shows that the cut could be read as rebellious more than a thousand years before rock and roll. A mullet in Constantinople was not neutral. It told everyone which side you were on.

Between antiquity and the twentieth century

It would be tempting to draw a straight line from Procopius to 1980s hockey players, but the honest picture is patchier. Men's hair in Europe went through many cycles of long and short over the following centuries, and portraits from different periods show hair that is fuller at the back than the front. Calling all of those images mullets would be exactly the kind of retrospective labelling the dictionary warns us about. What we can say is that the basic proportion, shorter above the brow and longer at the neck, kept reappearing whenever fashion allowed men to grow their hair [3].

Glam rock and the 1970s

The modern mullet story begins in earnest in the 1970s, when long hair for men had become ordinary after the 1960s. Layered cuts that were cropped on top and left long at the neck appeared on rock musicians, most famously David Bowie in his Ziggy Stardust period, when his spiky red hair was short and lifted on top with length at the back. Paul McCartney and other musicians of the decade wore softer versions [1].

These styles were not called mullets at the time. They were experiments with layering and volume made possible by new cutting techniques, blow-dryers and styling products. The point was often androgyny and theatre. A short, lifted crown with a trailing back looked unlike either the neat short-back-and-sides of the 1950s or the uniform long hair of the late 1960s.

The 1980s: sport, country and heavy metal

By the 1980s the shape had spread far beyond rock stages. It became common among athletes, especially in ice hockey and football, among country singers and among heavy metal fans [1]. For many working-class men in North America, Britain and Australia it was simply a normal haircut: tidy enough at the front for work, long enough at the back to feel free on the weekend. The later joke, business in the front and party in the back, describes that double life well, even though the slogan itself came after the cut's peak.

The early 1990s brought perhaps the most famous example in country music, Billy Ray Cyrus, whose 1992 hit Achy Breaky Heart made his long-backed cut instantly recognisable. Within a couple of years the Beastie Boys had given the style its name, and once it had a name it became a target.

From punchline to revival

Through the late 1990s and 2000s the mullet was mostly a punchline, shorthand in films and television for a person who was out of date or unsophisticated. That reputation tells us as much about class and taste as about hair. A cut that had been worn by glam rockers became associated with rural and working-class men, and mocking it became a way of mocking them.

Then, as so often happens in hair history, the joke wore off. In the late 2010s and 2020s younger barbers and their clients rediscovered the shape, often combining it with modern techniques such as skin fades, textured crops and curls left natural on top. Mullet competitions in Australia and the United States have turned the style into a celebration, and fashion photography has adopted it as a deliberately bold look [1]. The modern mullet is usually softer and more blended than its 1980s ancestor, but the proportion is the same one Suetonius described.

Why the mullet keeps coming back

Looking across three thousand years, a few patterns stand out. The mullet appears when men are allowed to grow their hair but still want a tidy face. It is often worn by groups who want to look different from an establishment, whether Byzantine factions, glam rockers or modern barbershop experimenters. And it is often described by outsiders with contempt, from Procopius to late-1990s comedians.

For historians of hair, the mullet is also a lesson in method. Separate the name from the object. Read hostile sources for what they reveal about the writer as well as the wearer. Treat practical explanations as hypotheses. And remember that a haircut that looks ridiculous to one generation can look brave and beautiful to the next.

A note on hair and the scalp

A long-backed cut does not change how hair grows. Hair at the nape and on the crown grows from follicles that follow the same cycle as anywhere else on the scalp, and cutting the front short does not make the back grow faster. Readers interested in how hair growth actually works can find plain-language explanations of the hair cycle and scalp health from the trichology community at https://trichology.com.

Sources

  1. Mullet (haircut), Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mullet_(haircut)
  2. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars (overview), Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suetonius
  3. Hairstyle history overview, Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hairstyle
  4. Procopius, Secret History (Anecdota) 7.8–10, trans. H. B. Dewing, LacusCurtius. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Procopius/Anecdota/7*.html

Corrections and source suggestions are welcome; see our editorial standards.

Daily hair history, one image at a time, on Instagram @the_history_of_hair

Follow on Instagram